Lapierre the new Bernie Goetz?
On March 5, 2010, around 1:50 into the third period, Scott Nichol received a pass from Torrey Mitchell, rang it off the post, and then continued on his way, trying to set up for another chance. In no way was he endangering any Canadiens player, attempting anything cheap, or really doing anything except for trying to score a goal. Maxim Lapierre, following Nichol, slashed him, and then cross-checked him from behind. Nichol flew full-speed into the boards, hitting his shoulder, and crumpled onto the ice. He laid there for a while, his legs twitching (yes, twitching) in pain. When he got up to say some things I am sure are not suitable for a family atmosphere, he was holding his arm close to his chest, trying to keep his shoulder in place. He did not return for the rest of the game, and is now expected to be out for 7-10 days (in Sharks-speak, that’s usually 2-3 weeks at the very least).
Lapierre got no penalty, no beat-down from any of the Sharks players, nothing. The only penalties that arose were from the scrum afterwards, to Jay Leach and Travis Moen. Lapierre was actually smiling after it, if you can believe it.
Now, I admit, I’m incredibly biased. Nichol plays for the Sharks, and Lapierre doesn’t. But really, if Nichol didn’t twist his body so that he’d only end up with a shoulder injury, it would have been his head crashing into the boards, and his neck absorbing that force. There was a very real possibility that he could have been paralyzed or worse.
I can go on about how I think that’s a dirty cheapshot and something that should be completely removed from the game, as well as Chris Lee’s complete inability to see something so completely obvious 15 feet away, but that’s been dealt with. People have talked about it already and a 4-game suspension has been doled out.
The thing that gets me, the thing that really pisses me off, is the insistence by some fans – largely Montreal fans, but some other ones as well – that Nichol deserved it because of all the cheap shots that he has thrown throughout his career.
In short, to some, Maxim Lapierre has become Bernie Goetz.
They feel that the violent actions of one can be justified if the victim has committed crimes in the past, and could possibly commit crimes in the future. They feel that by physically hurting Nichol and keeping him out of the game for weeks will improve the NHL, and that Lapierre should not be indicted because he was doing a public service, or because it “would take 10 more of Lapierre’s hits to make up for all of Nichol’s cheapshots.” People are wishing injury on Nichol, and that’s just wrong.
Has the situation gotten so bad in the NHL that some fans are wishing for more dangerous hits like that on borderline-dirty players? Has it gotten to the point where fans no longer trust the referees and the NHL’s supplementary discipline, just like how New Yorkers had completely lost faith in their police force? The entire Sharks-Canadiens game was an example of a game that got completely out of hand, where cheap-shots were being doled out like AOL CDs back in the lates 1990s, but that’s just a rare occurance, right? I’d like to think so, but the reaction to the game and the hit itself is worrying.
There are jokes about Colin Campbell’s Wheel of Justice and, of course, DGB’s famous suspension chart. The thing that worries me is that the jokes are true. People were wondering if Lapierre would even get a suspension, which, for an obviously dirty play such as that (disregarding any outside factors such as the perpetrator, the victim, and how the rest of the game was going, it was unquestionably dirty), should not even be a question. And then add to that how people were commenting how it was a good thing – have I been transported back to the early 80s?
I like the hits and the fights that make up good, physical hockey. Douglas Murray of the Sharks is one of my favorite players, and is well-known for his ability to dish out huge and completely legal hits. Fighting to settle scores without resorting to cheap shots is, in my opinion, the best way to administer justice so that the players can feel satisfied. David Booth did it with Mike Richards, and for all intents and purposes, the score from Richards’s headshot has been settled. I am not advocating to take out the physical play of hockey – I just don’t want the players and the fans to feel like the only way to dole out justice is by cheapshots on players. I don’t want Lapierre, or any other player, to be Bernie Goetz.
| Tags: its hockey time, people are stupid, RANT, scott nichol, shaaaaarks | 2 Comments |

Fools and Sages was created as an outlet for photoshopping, web design, and hockey rants. I currently attend school in Southern California, but do not hesitate to yell "BEAT LA!" As a Sharks fan, I will defend Patrick Marleau to the death. I have stats, and I'm not afraid to use them.

2 Responses to “Lapierre the new Bernie Goetz?”
March 6th, 2010 saat: 1:47 am
I was commenting on another forum much earlier in the day and said the following:
“I can’t decide what about this incident irritates me more.
A) That it happened and he didn’t even get a penalty
B) Habs fans claiming it was a clean play and that Nichol was embellishing (he didn’t return to the game and is expected to miss at least the next two weeks).
C) That Habs fans seem to think it’s okay to do that to Nichol because he’s also a pest. ”
I know better than to read internet forums when I’m emotionally invested in a topic, so I should have known not to go reading Puck Daddy and TSN comments today. So I tried to put myself in a habs fans’ shoes and thought back to when Staubitz hit a player late into the boards (I believe in the first or second Kings game) and not defending it at all. It was a dirty hit and didn’t make me proud he was a Shark. It didn’t help that Ivanans proceeded to beat the living tar out of Shelley for the hit either (I guess Staubitz really learned his lesson).
Which brings me to my rant of the day. The 4th thing that irritates the crap out of me is “Sharks fans” claiming the Sharks were soft and didn’t stick up for their guy. I think that’s total BS.
First, the Sharks went and won the game, in regulation, denying the Habs 2 points they desperately need, if that doesn’t stick it to them (to quote Malhotra) I don’t know what does.
Beyond that, there was a giant scrum after the play with a Shark (Leach) recieving a roughing minor. Heater later crush Plekanec on a great open ice hit. There was a ton of hits and gritty play to close out the game. Just because we didn’t have a Shelley on the ice to fight some other version of Shelley on their team doesn’t mean the Sharks just let them get away with it.
Lets face it, there was no way LaPierre would drop the gloves, so a Shark could have taken an instigator penalty if anybody went after him directly. It’s not like the Sharks even knew it was LaPierre, they thought it was Markov, so when somebody takes him out that makes things better?
The Sharks responded to the hit in many ways, just because gloves weren’t on the ice doesn’t mean they didn’t take care of their guy.
March 6th, 2010 saat: 12:11 pm
I didn’t say that the Sharks didn’t answer that hit – they certainly did, in the way that hurts the playoff-bubble Canadiens the most – but I was just saying that maybe the Habs’ fans reactions are a symptom of a different problem that’s much bigger than just the Sharks. Hell, their wish for injury wasn’t even about Nichol’s play on the Sharks, because I can’t remember one dirty hit he had this year. It was about how they felt that some players haven’t been punished enough to their liking, and how Lapierre fulfilled their idea of retribution.
Then again, it could just be Habs fans, I don’t know.
Trackbacks
Leave a Reply